controller system lmc Search Results


lmc system  (Leap Motion Inc)
90
Leap Motion Inc lmc system
Average sampling rate obtained with the <t> LMC, </t> and the number of usable trials (≤ 40 ms of missing data) obtained from the LMC and <t> Optotrak. </t>
Lmc System, supplied by Leap Motion Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/controller+system+lmc/pmc05846796-80-18-23?v=Leap+Motion+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
lmc system - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Average sampling rate obtained with the LMC, and the number of usable trials (≤ 40 ms of missing data) obtained from the LMC and Optotrak.

Journal: PLoS ONE

Article Title: Evaluation of the Leap Motion Controller during the performance of visually-guided upper limb movements

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193639

Figure Lengend Snippet: Average sampling rate obtained with the LMC, and the number of usable trials (≤ 40 ms of missing data) obtained from the LMC and Optotrak.

Article Snippet: Limb kinematic data were captured with 2 motion capture systems: Optotrak 3D Investigator system (NDI, Waterloo) and the LMC system (software version 2.3.1, Leap Motion Inc, San Francisco, USA).

Techniques: Sampling

(A) Raw and filtered velocity data from the LMC trials that were accepted for analysis. (B) Comparison of the Optotrak and LMC velocity data obtained on concurrent trials.

Journal: PLoS ONE

Article Title: Evaluation of the Leap Motion Controller during the performance of visually-guided upper limb movements

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193639

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Raw and filtered velocity data from the LMC trials that were accepted for analysis. (B) Comparison of the Optotrak and LMC velocity data obtained on concurrent trials.

Article Snippet: Limb kinematic data were captured with 2 motion capture systems: Optotrak 3D Investigator system (NDI, Waterloo) and the LMC system (software version 2.3.1, Leap Motion Inc, San Francisco, USA).

Techniques: Comparison

Difference (Δ Optotrak–LMC) in (A) movement time, (B) duration of the acceleration interval, (C) duration of the deceleration interval, (D) peak velocity, (E) endpoint accuracy along azimuth.

Journal: PLoS ONE

Article Title: Evaluation of the Leap Motion Controller during the performance of visually-guided upper limb movements

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193639

Figure Lengend Snippet: Difference (Δ Optotrak–LMC) in (A) movement time, (B) duration of the acceleration interval, (C) duration of the deceleration interval, (D) peak velocity, (E) endpoint accuracy along azimuth.

Article Snippet: Limb kinematic data were captured with 2 motion capture systems: Optotrak 3D Investigator system (NDI, Waterloo) and the LMC system (software version 2.3.1, Leap Motion Inc, San Francisco, USA).

Techniques:

Three typical trials illustrating finger’s velocity during the bead threading task obtained from the Optotrak and LMC systems on concurrent trials.

Journal: PLoS ONE

Article Title: Evaluation of the Leap Motion Controller during the performance of visually-guided upper limb movements

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193639

Figure Lengend Snippet: Three typical trials illustrating finger’s velocity during the bead threading task obtained from the Optotrak and LMC systems on concurrent trials.

Article Snippet: Limb kinematic data were captured with 2 motion capture systems: Optotrak 3D Investigator system (NDI, Waterloo) and the LMC system (software version 2.3.1, Leap Motion Inc, San Francisco, USA).

Techniques: